ReasonGo

Appendix 2 · 1,790 words · 8 min

Appendix 2: Sources cited in this book

Where the data and arguments in the book come from, listed by chapter with source type and URL, so anything can be checked or updated.

This appendix lists the sources behind the data and the main arguments in each chapter, in chapter order. Every entry gives the source type, the chapter it supports and a URL, so readers can check and update them.

Chapter 1: The paradigm shift

Consumer trust in AI search

Gartner forecast on search engine traffic

Scale of generative AI users in China

Rising weight of authoritative sources in AI citations

How consumers handle AI search

Chapter 2: The core principles of Impact GEO

The citation weight gap between authoritative media and independent accounts

  • Data cited: Content from national-level media is 8 to 12 times more likely to be cited by AI than content from ordinary sources. One national media outlet can carry more citation weight than a hundred independent accounts combined.
  • Source: Industry research data, cited in GEO industry analysis articles.
  • URL: http://www.xtrb.cn/syunf/2026-08/25/content_1288492.htm

Share of AI citations going to independent accounts and brand websites

  • Data cited: Earned media (third-party sources) account for 82% to 94% of all AI citations; brand-owned websites account for a single-digit share.
  • Source: AuthorityTech, 2026 study.
  • URL: https://authoritytech.io/

Keyword density and citation rate

  • Data cited: Pages above 8% keyword density are 17% less likely to be cited by AI than pages at a natural 2%–3%.
  • Source: Industry test data. Widely repeated across GEO industry analysis articles; the original publication is still to be confirmed. Readers are referred to the testing section of the GEO industry whitepaper.

Chapter 3: The white-hat GEO method

The DSS principles (white-hat GEO method)

Structured content and citation probability

  • Data cited: Content in structured formats is 63% more likely to be cited directly by AI than plain text.
  • Source: Volcano Engine developer community analysis report (April 2026), cited in GEO industry articles.
  • URL: https://www.hongshu18.com/article-detail/BPL38gEB

Cited sources, statistics and direct quotes

  • Data cited: Content with cited sources is 34.4% more likely to be cited by AI, content with statistics 32.1%, content with direct quotes 29.7%.
  • Source: Industry test data. Widely repeated across GEO industry analysis articles; the original publication is still to be confirmed. Readers are referred to the testing section of the GEO industry whitepaper.

Named authors in AI citations

Platforms cutting back low-quality content

  • Data cited: DeepSeek compressed the sources it reads closely from 10-15 down to 4-5, and citation rates for more than 70% of mass-distributed press-release GEO content fell sharply.
  • Source: DeepSeek's May 2026 algorithm update, analyzed by several GEO industry outlets.
  • URL: https://www.hongshu18.com/article-detail/BPL38gEB

Schema markup and citation rate

  • Data cited: Content without structured markup loses about 47% of its weight in AI citation on average.
  • Source: Industry test data. Widely repeated across GEO industry analysis articles; the original publication is still to be confirmed. Readers are referred to the testing section of the GEO industry whitepaper.

Chapter 4: Incentives in the content ecosystem

Weight allocation across the five scoring dimensions

  • Data cited: Media tier and endorsements (25%), content expertise (22%), social and citation signals (20%), site health (18%), content freshness (15%).
  • Source: Public information from the major AI platforms plus industry testing. The weights are an industry observation; actual platform weights may differ, and readers should check each platform's own documentation.

Freshness and AI citation

  • Data cited: AI engines rarely cite content that has not been updated in about two years, and the correlation between metadata freshness and citation rate reaches 0.68.
  • Source: Industry research. Widely repeated across GEO industry analysis articles; the original publication is still to be confirmed. Readers are referred to the testing section of the GEO industry whitepaper.

Google Preferred Sources data

The C2PA provenance standard

The GEO service trust assessment

Chapter 5: Governance and standards

The T/CAPT 026—2026 association standard

  • Data cited: China's first association standard for trusted GEO dissemination. It sets up the A/B/C/D four-tier credibility rating and specifies three-zone separation, end-to-end traceability, a circuit-breaker mechanism and the L1/L2/L3 service capability tiers.
  • Source: Issued by the China Association of News Technology Professionals, standard number T/CAPT 026—2026.
  • URL: https://www.ttbz.org.cn/standardDetail/8617629717344255b65b44426dc77ce8.html

Bodies that took part in drafting

  • Data cited: Drafted with participation from Xinhuanet Convergence Media Future Research Institute, the Xinhua News Agency State Key Laboratory and the Guangxi Daily.
  • Source: Xinhuanet and Guangxi News reporting.
  • URL: https://v.gxnews.com.cn/ (Guangxi Daily reporting)

The CAC's "Qinglang" campaign against AI application chaos

  • Data cited: The campaign lists AI data poisoning carried out by tampering with training corpora, fabricating authoritative data or using GEO technology for malicious marketing as a priority target.
  • Source: The CAC's "Cyberspace China" account, reported by CCTV.com, Guangming Online and others.
  • URL: https://m.gmw.cn/2026-05/01/content_38744439.htm

CAA GEO standardization work

The UK CMA ruling against Google

DeepSeek source compression

  • Data cited: DeepSeek cut the sources it reads closely at the final stage from 10-15 down to 4-5, and citation rates for more than 70% of mass-distributed press-release GEO content fell sharply.
  • Source: DeepSeek's May 2026 algorithm update, analyzed by GEO industry outlets.
  • URL: https://www.hongshu18.com/article-detail/BPL38gEB

Cross-verification on AI platforms

  • Data cited: The odds of content being blocked as a single point of failure reach 95%, and content that contradicts itself across platforms sees its odds of being featured fall 82%.
  • Source: Industry test data, cited in GEO industry analysis articles.
  • URL: https://cloud.tencent.com.cn/developer/article/ (Tencent Cloud developer community analysis)

Research report on a trusted GEO ecosystem

Preface and chapter 1 case

The Apollo-9 smart band poisoning case

Notes on sources

  1. Every source listed here is public material actually consulted while writing the book. Some industry test data (keyword density, Schema markup, scoring weights and similar figures) is repeated across many GEO analysis articles without a clear original publication; those entries say so.
  2. The full text of the association standard is available on the national association standards information platform (www.ttbz.org.cn). Policy documents are available from the CAC's "Cyberspace China" account and from Xinhuanet, Guangming Online and other official outlets.
  3. For academic research data (AI citation source statistics, trust surveys and the like), readers should obtain the original report for the full methodology and sample information before judging how far the figures apply.
  4. This appendix is updated with each revision of the book. Corrections and additions are welcome.